The Squeeze of Global Supply Chains: Challenges in the Wake of COVID-19
- Mark Fernando
- Jan 31
- 5 min read
20th January 2021
Global supply chains are facing unprecedented strain in 2021, as the pandemic continues to disrupt industries. This article explores the bottlenecks and how economies are adapting to new trade realities.

The global economy is currently in the midst of a tumultuous period. Supply chains, the lifeblood of international trade, have been severely disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, sending shockwaves across industries that depend on timely deliveries of goods and services. What was once a reliable mechanism of global commerce has now become a labyrinth of bottlenecks, delays, and rising costs. The world is witnessing what could be described as a "squeeze" on global supply chains, where the flow of materials, goods, and even information is stymied at various points in the production and distribution process.
This is, of course, an unprecedented scenario. While supply chain disruptions are not new—trade has always been subject to interruptions due to everything from natural disasters to geopolitical tensions—the scale of the disruption caused by the pandemic is unlike anything we've experienced in modern history. As countries grapple with lockdowns, factory shutdowns, and transportation gridlocks, industries have struggled to adapt. Even as economies have started to emerge from the initial shock of the pandemic, the question remains: How long will this strain continue, and what will the new "normal" look like in a post-pandemic world?
One of the most visible impacts of this disruption has been the massive delays in shipping. Container shortages, port congestion, and labour shortages have led to significant delays in the movement of goods across the globe. What was once a smooth, albeit complex, process of transferring goods from one part of the world to another has become an increasingly fraught task. Consider, for instance, the shipping crisis that has plagued major ports such as those in Los Angeles and Shanghai. As companies struggle to secure space for their goods, shipping rates have skyrocketed, adding considerable costs to businesses. This, in turn, has led to higher prices for consumers.
Moreover, the shortage of goods has caused ripple effects across industries. A shortage of semiconductors, for example, has disrupted the production of everything from smartphones to automobiles. The car industry, in particular, has been hit hard by this shortage, with manufacturers such as Toyota and General Motors forced to reduce production. Similarly, industries that rely on timely deliveries of raw materials—such as construction, electronics, and consumer goods—have experienced delays, resulting in bottlenecks and missed deadlines.
The global nature of these disruptions has created a situation where no country is immune. Even nations that were initially insulated from the worst of the pandemic have found themselves caught in the web of global supply chain disruptions. A country such as Germany, with its highly integrated manufacturing sector, has been hit by delays in the supply of essential components, affecting its automotive and industrial sectors. Similarly, the UK has experienced shortages of everything from food to electronics, as the pandemic has wreaked havoc on supply lines from the European Union and beyond.
While the strain on global supply chains is most evident in the movement of goods, it is also having a profound impact on the global workforce. Labour shortages have emerged as another critical issue, as the pandemic has disrupted the normal flow of workers into key industries. In many countries, lockdowns have kept workers from returning to their jobs, while others have been sidelined due to illness or quarantine protocols. In the shipping industry, for example, longshoremen and dock workers have been in short supply, causing delays at ports. Similarly, the shortage of truck drivers has made it more difficult to move goods from ports to warehouses and retail outlets.
In the face of these challenges, industries are having to adapt quickly. For some companies, this has meant rethinking their supply chain strategies altogether. The pandemic has highlighted the risks of over-reliance on global supply chains and has prompted many businesses to reconsider the wisdom of just-in-time inventory systems, which depend on the smooth and uninterrupted flow of goods. In the future, companies may place more emphasis on building resilience into their supply chains, diversifying suppliers, and investing in domestic production capabilities.
At the same time, governments around the world have begun to implement policies aimed at mitigating the effects of supply chain disruptions. For example, the United States has introduced stimulus packages to support industries affected by the pandemic, while the European Union has discussed initiatives to bolster the resilience of supply chains within the bloc. However, the sheer scale of the disruption means that these measures are unlikely to be a quick fix. The pandemic has exposed the vulnerabilities of global supply chains, and it will likely take years for these systems to fully recover.
The question of how economies are adapting to new trade realities brings to mind one of the most enduring themes in English literature—the question of resilience in the face of adversity. In Charles Dickens’ A Tale of Two Cities, the opening lines famously state, “It was the best of times, it was the worst of times…” This paradox encapsulates the current state of global trade. The worst of times has certainly arrived, as businesses and governments struggle to cope with the effects of the pandemic on supply chains. But it is also the best of times in the sense that this crisis has sparked new opportunities for adaptation and innovation. As the pandemic has exposed the weaknesses of current systems, there is hope that we may emerge from this crisis with stronger, more resilient trade networks.
Similarly, the theme of resilience appears throughout Shakespeare's The Tempest, in which characters face overwhelming challenges but ultimately emerge transformed. The disruption of global supply chains has indeed been a tempest for industries and economies, but like the characters in Shakespeare’s play, businesses are adapting and finding new ways to navigate these turbulent waters. However, it must be noted that not every company or sector will fare equally well in this new reality. As with all stories of adversity, some will rise to the occasion, while others may falter.
Moreover, this crisis serves as a reminder of the complex interconnectedness of our global economy. Much like the sprawling, intricate web of relationships that we find in novels such as Moby-Dick by Herman Melville, the global supply chain operates as a delicate network. Each disruption in one part of this network sends reverberations throughout the system, affecting not just one business but an entire industry or even country. The story of the white whale in Moby-Dickis an allegory for obsession, but it also serves as a metaphor for the dangers of over-dependence on a single goal—whether it be a resource, a market, or a method of production. The current supply chain crisis is a reminder that over-reliance on fragile systems can lead to catastrophic failures.
In conclusion, the squeeze on global supply chains in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic is a phenomenon that will likely define the early years of the 2020s. The challenges faced by industries and economies are immense, but they also present an opportunity for growth and reinvention. Just as English literature has often depicted characters overcoming adversity to emerge stronger, so too will the global economy. However, as we move forward, businesses, governments, and individuals alike must recognise the need for resilience, adaptability, and a willingness to rethink the systems upon which we rely. The future may hold challenges, but it also holds the possibility of a more resilient and sustainable global trade framework—one that, much like the great literary heroes, rises to meet the storm


